Thought Starter 2: The Consuming Community as the Ultimate “Customers” for CE Outcomes

The Consuming Community as the Ultimate “Customers” for CE Outcomes

The Immutable Foundation: Commercial Realities

At its core, this relationship is shaped by commercial realities: Who is paying for change, and are they receiving value for money?

We have to assume that PI&Ds are constantly alert to opportunities to address needs or demands emerging from the consuming community. And after structured market analysis, they may decide to develop a product or service that best and most efficiently satisfies that demand.
.This is a critical juncture. Design and manufacturing decisions made here effectively determine the ultimate fate of end-of-first-life products (EoFLPs). At this stage, PI&Ds face two possible outcomes—or often somewhere in between:

• The product is enthusiastically acquired by grateful customers, leading to commercial success.
• Or, it ends up as unsold stock in a warehouse.

From the consumer’s perspective, this outcome depends on how diligently they assess what is being offered.

Informing Decisions in a CE Paradigm

In TS#4, we will explore measures to better inform both parties at this stage of the economic cycle—which covers assessments utility, pricing, and presentation as the basis of decision making for the consumer. However within a Circular Economy (CE) paradigm, this must also include observing the chain of material custody for all resources involved, including the post-consumer fate of the product and the effort and resources invested. This issue needs to match the original design intent of the producer, with the motivations and ambitions of the customer with the available discard option presented.

It is useful to recall the 13+ “R” strategies that PI&Ds might consider at the design stage:
Refuse, Rethink, Reuse, Repair, Refurbish, Remanufacture, Repurpose, Recycle, Research, Re-skill, Re-design, Re-vision, Recover, or others.

Note: All options except “Refuse” require direct access to relevant EoFL discard/return pathways for PI&D-selected outcomes to be realized. Even if these pathways exist, the community must be motivated to participate—another critical issue for TS#4. The community’s role in directing EoFL materials toward their best and highest post-consumer fate is a vital link in the continuous responsibility chain needed for a fully operational CE to function as envisaged

Addressing Consumer Variability

An unavoidable reality remains everyone is different, and not all consumers will conscientiously “do the right thing” or feel committed to CE outcomes. For example, even with enforced road rules, there are always outliers who behave differently. Similarly, influencing split-second decisions—such as whether to discard a banana peel in general waste or FOGO—requires planning for non-compliance. The sum of all these individually tiny actions may seem inconsequential, but, in aggregate they are crucial.

If PI&Ds conclude that all/any of the  “R” options, other than yellow-bin packaging recycling, are optimal, then TS#3 and TS#4 must address this challenge.

One systematic approach could be designing a streaming/cascading recovery framework for post-consumer materials. In this model:

• Materials are channelled toward their optimal next use whenever possible, but
• For all others, their end use cascades down to the next best option—never to valueless disposal.

If adopted, this approach must also be integrated into TS#3 and TS#4.

Summary

The consuming community plays a pivotal role in the overarching supply-and-demand relationship with PI&Ds. While PI&Ds exert significant influence over eventual CE outcomes through product design and manufacturing decisions, the community’s responsibility extends beyond purchasing goods and services. Consumers must not only reward excellence in product quality and sustainability but also actively facilitate the optimized post-consumer fate of these offerings.

It is equally important to recognize that this same consuming community ultimately bears the cost of whatever outcomes are achieved—whether through rates, taxes, or the price of goods. This reality underscores the need for a streamlined, integrated approach to crafting the CE framework. Efforts should focus on delivering the systematically developed  solutions that align with the community’s aspirations, rather than adopting isolated initiatives that primarily only serve the interests of prevailing post-consumer resource recovery service providers. The ultimate goal must be to support the conscientiously developed plans of PI&Ds, ensuring that product design and lifecycle strategies deliver genuine value for money and meet the expectations of those who pay for change.

In summary, achieving a fully operational CE requires a continuous chain of responsibility, where PI&Ds and consumers collaborate effectively. PI&Ds must design products with end-of-life options in mind, while consumers must engage in responsible disposal and recovery practices via a suite of readily available discard options   Only through this shared commitment can the nation realize the economic, environmental, and social benefits envisioned in a circular economy paradigm.

Click here to subscribe and get each new paper delivered directly to your inbox the moment it’s published.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in each paper are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of AIEN.